Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03847
Original file (BC 2007 03847.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03847
		INDEX CODE:  110.00
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded 
to honorable.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT

In the past 28 years he has become a contributing member of 
society.  He is reformed and his behavior warrants a re-
evaluation with respect to his discharge. 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 Dec 78, for a 
period of four years in the grade of airman basic.  His highest 
grade held was airman.

On 12 Oct 79, applicant’s commander notified him that he was 
recommending that he be discharged from the Air Force for 
possession of marijuana and being disorderly on station.  The 
applicant received an Article 15, and was ordered to forfeit 
$200 and was reduced in rank to airman basic. 

On 19 Oct 79, applicant was interviewed by an evaluation 
officer, who found that the applicant was subject to discharge 
for misconduct, and recommended a general discharge, with 
probation and rehabilitation.  

On 23 Oct 79, the applicant, after seeking counsel, submitted a 
statement acknowledging abuse of marijuana, and denying the 
disorderly conduct incident.  He also stated his proficient duty 
performance supported an honorable discharge.

The Staff Judge Advocate reviewed the case file and found it 
legally sufficient to support discharge and recommended a 
general discharge without probation and rehabilitation.  The 
discharge authority approved the separation and directed a 
general discharge without probation and rehabilitation.

Applicant was discharged on 1 Nov 79, in the grade of airman 
basic, under the provisions of AFM 39-12, for Misconduct – Drug 
Abuse, and was issued a general discharge.  He served on active 
duty for a period of 10 months and 14 days.

Pursuant to the Board’s request on 27 Dec 07, the Federal Bureau 
of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, indicated on 28 Dec 
07, that, on the basis of the data furnished, they are unable to 
locate an arrest record (Exhibit C).

On 1 Feb 08, a request for post-service information was 
forwarded to the applicant for response within 30 days.  The 
applicant has a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science.  He is 
currently pursuing his Master’s degree in Computer Science.  He 
attended several educational seminars and training classes 
including Microsoft Server 2003, SQL Server 2005, and Project 
Management.  He provided his employment history since leaving 
the military.  He is currently working as a Software Engineer.  
He is married and he enjoys spending time with his family.  He 
contributes to a couple of charities, Sunshine Ministries, 
Harris House, and the St. Louis Symphony Orchestra.  He provided 
names and phone numbers of three personal references.  

Applicant’s complete response is attached at Exhibit E.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  The Board finds no impropriety in the characterization of 
applicant's discharge.  It appears that responsible officials 
applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and 
we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations 
were violated or that the applicant was not afforded all the 
rights to which he was entitled at the time of discharge.  The 
applicant has not shown the characterization of the discharge 
was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, nor 
has it been shown the nature of the discharge was unduly harsh 
or disproportionate to the offenses committed.  Considered 
alone, we conclude the discharge proceedings were proper and 
characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the 
existing circumstances.  

4.  Consideration of this Board, however, is not limited to the 
events which precipitated the discharge.  We have a 
Congressional mandate which permits consideration of other 
factors; e.g., applicant's background, the overall quality of 
service, and post-service activities and accomplishments.  
Further, we may base our decision on matters of equity and 
clemency rather than simply on whether rules and regulations 
which existed at the time were followed.  This is a much broader 
consideration than officials involved in the discharge were 
permitted, and our decision in no way discredits the validity of 
theirs.

5.  Taking into consideration the available post-service 
information, it appears likely that applicant has overcome the 
behavioral traits which led to the discharge action and has led 
a stable and productive life since the separation.  We recognize 
the adverse impact of the discharge the applicant received; and, 
while it may have been appropriate at the time, we believe it 
would be an injustice for the applicant to continue to suffer 
its effects.  Accordingly, we find that corrective action is 
appropriate on the basis of clemency and recommend the records 
be corrected as indicated below.  

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 1 
November 1979, he was honorably discharged and furnished an 
Honorable Discharge certificate.

_______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number    
BC-2007-03847 in Executive Session on 19 Mar 08, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
	XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
	XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number     
BC-2007-03847 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, 23 Nov 07.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  FBI Negative Reply, dated 28 Dec 07.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 1 Feb 08, w/atch.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, undated.




				   XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                   Panel Chair



AFBCMR BC-2007-03847




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

	Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction 
of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A 
Stat 116), it is directed that:

	The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to 
[APPLICANT], be corrected to show that on 1 November 1979, he was honorably discharged and 
furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.





                                                                            XXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                                            Director
                                                                            Air Force Review Boards Agency




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02864

    Original file (BC-2007-02864.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a legal review of the discharge case file, the staff judge advocate found it legally sufficient and recommended that he be discharged from the Air Force with a general discharge and concurred with the evaluation officer that the applicant not be considered for probation and rehabilitation. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Nov 07. Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Nov 07, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03499

    Original file (BC-2006-03499.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03499 INDEX CODE: 106.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 May 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1988 general discharge be upgraded to honorable. The recommendation was approved on 7 Dec 88.] Although the applicant did not specifically request consideration based on clemency, we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00841

    Original file (BC-2008-00841.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 Feb 07, applicant was discharged in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of misconduct, with service characterized as under honorable conditions (general) and was issued an RE Code of 2B (involuntarily separated with a general discharge). The Board acknowledged the applicant’s high motivation to re-enter military service; however, the Board denied an upgrade of his RE code. As noted in the statement of facts his RE code has been administratively...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03103

    Original file (BC-2007-03103.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03103 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His characterization of service be upgraded from general (under honorable conditions) to honorable. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | bc-2007-01883

    Original file (bc-2007-01883.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01883 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 DEC 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated 30 Nov 79, be corrected to reflect award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) First Oak Leaf...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00408

    Original file (BC-2004-00408.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00408 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 18 Jan 80, applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFM 39-12, by reason of misconduct - frequent involvement...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01087

    Original file (BC-2007-01087.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His PTA states that the “government in this case agrees not to process administrative discharge action against the Accused any sooner than two weeks after the childbirth of his wife but not later than 6 Dec 05.” He was administratively discharged after the set time established in his pretrial agreement. On 26 Dec 05, applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting that his under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. After review of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03192

    Original file (BC-2007-03192.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03192 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge and the narrative reason for separation changed. DPSOS states the applicant has not submitted any evidence or identified any errors...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03197

    Original file (BC-2007-03197.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 Oct 64, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for unsuitability. The evaluation officer conducted an interview with the applicant, reviewed his records and comments by his commander, and recommended his discharge from the Air Force with a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02843

    Original file (BC-2007-02843.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 Aug 82, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failing to report for duty at the appointed place and time. d. On 15 Sep 82, he received an LOC for failing to adequately support his dependent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...